the 2015 Perl QA Hackathon in Berlin
I spent last week in Berlin, at the 2015 Perl QA Hackathon. This is an annual event where a group of various programmers involved with the “CPAN toolchain” and closely related projects get together, hash out future plans, write code that is hard to get written in “free time,” and communicate in person the hard that is stuff to communicate over IRC and email.
I always find the QA Hackathon to be very invigorating, as I get to really dig into things that I know need work. That was the case this year, too. I was a bit slow to start, by by the last day I didn’t really want to stop for food or socialization, and I spent dinner scowling at my laptop trying to run new code.
The hackathon is an invitational event, and I was fortunate to be invited and even more fortunate that my travel and lodging was covered in part by The Perl Foundation and in part by the conference sponsors, who deserve a set of big high fives: thinkproject!, amazon Development Center, STRATO AG, Booking.com, AffinityLive, Travis CI, Bluehost, GFU Cyrus AG, Evozon, infinity interactive, Neo4j, Frankfurt Perl Mongers, Perl 6 Community, Les Mongueurs de Perl, YAPC Europe Foundation, Perl Weekly, elasticsearch, LiquidWeb, DreamHost, qp procura, mongoDB, Campus Explorer
I arrived in Berlin ahead of time, which helped me overcome jetlag. Happily
enough, I was on the same flight as David Golden, Matthew Horsfall (+1), and
Tatsuhiko Miyagawa. We chatted and sat around at Newark and on the way to the
hotel in Berlin. More than that, Matthew and I set up an ad hoc network on the
plane and chatted using
netcat. Eventually I wrote an incredibly bad file
transfer tool and we
swapped some code and music. It was stupid, but excellent. We vowed to do
better on the way back.
Once we’d dropped our bags at the hotel, we went out for a walk around the neighborhood. We saw a still-standing hunk of the wall, considered walking to the big TV tower, and then gave up and got currywurst. It was okay. After that, we caught a train back to the hotel, checked in, and crashed for a little while.
We found a totally decent little restaurant and got some dinner. Eventually, I ended up in bed and felt pretty normal the next morning!
The next day, we did more exploring, this time seeing more of the sorts of things you’re meant to see when you visit Berlin.
I wish we’d had more time (and, more importantly, energy) to really explore the Tiergarten. There were quite a few things listed on the map that I wanted to see, but I was barely up for the little exploration we did. In my defense, the Tiergarten is ⅔ the size of Central Park!
The hackathon got started that night with the arrival dinner. I was delighted to get goulash and spätzle. Peter Rabbitson was nonplussed. “Getting excited about spätzle is like getting excited about… grits!”
“Mmmm,” I said, “grits!”
Topics of Discussion
Last year, we skipped having any long debates about how to move things forward, and I was delighted. The previous round of them, in Lancaster, had been gruelling, and I expected much worse from them this year. Instead, I ended up thinking that they were pretty much okay. I think there were a number of reasons, although chief among them, I think that there were fewer people, and most of them had more actual stake in the problems being discussed. David Golden did an excellent job keeping them on topic and moving forward.
I won’t get too deep into how these went, because I know that others will do so better than I would. Neil Bowers has already written up some of the final day’s discussions on the river that is CPAN.
In brief, we talked about:
- whether, why, and how to move Test::Builder changes forward
- what promises we want to extract from each other as maintainers of the toolchain
- the possibility of a CPAN::Meta::Spec v3
- how we can promote a sense of responsibility and community among CPAN authors with many downstream dependents
I felt pretty good about how these talks went, for the most part. It remains to be seen how the planned actions pan out, but I’m hopeful on all fronts.
I’m going to throw in one negative thing, though, which came up not just during the big meetings, but all the time.
Things I am officially tired of: jokes about how "$X might be a code of conduct violation!" #perlqah2015— Ricardo Signes (@rjbs) April 19, 2015
I get it. People have feelings about a written and enforceable code of conduct. They might feel uncomfortable that they’ll accidentally get themselves kicked out, or they might resent it, or all kinds of other things. In reality, though, a conference’s code of conduct only comes up in three situations:
- when you have to accept it to attend
- when someone actually behaves very badly
- when endless trivializing jokes are made about it
If everybody would shut up about it, and just take to heart that technical conferences are places that should be free of abuse and harrassment, I think things like a written code of conduct would be generally unnoticed except by people in need of relief for actually being abused. Instead, there constant jokes about anyone making a comment with an unintended double meaning. “Hey, you’re violating my cock!” Yes, phrased like that, because I guess it’s hilarious that “code of conduct” acronymizes to sound like a slang phrase for a penis.
It’s gross, without even being funny to make up for it.
I actually try not to spend too much time on Dist::Zilla stuff at the QA Hackathon. I don’t think of it as part of the toolchain, precisely, and to me it’s very much a personal project that some other people happen to like. “Seriously,” I say, “you can use it, and it’s great, but it’s not making you any real guarantees. Check its work!” So, using time at the QA hackathon seems a bit disingenuous.
This year, though, I planned to spend a day on dealing with its backlog, because there were quite a few things where I felt that toolchain and QA things could be helped. As it turned out, though, very little actually went through.
I merged David Golden’s work to make release_status plugin-driven. This is in furtherance of implementing a hands-off semver-like setup. Hopefully we’ll see something new on that front in the future. That was a couple minutes of work re-reading code I’d already reviewed.
Most of the
dzil time that I spent was on making it possible to build your
to-be-released dist with one perl but then test it with another one. This was
suggested by Olivier Mengué when I half-jokingly suggested bumping the minimum
perl version for Dist::Zilla to 5.20. Someone said it would interfere with
Travis CI testing, and Olivier said, “what if you could test with a perl other
I implemented it, and
also the ability to set a built environment (for things like
PERL5LIB) and it
worked. The only problem was that … well, I just didn’t feel like it was the
right way forward.
If you want to test with five perls, you’ll still have to run the whole building workflow five times, because of how Dist::Zilla works. I see a way out of that, but it wasn’t a good project for a single day of unplanned work. It turned out that there were a few problems like this. It ended up feeling like a good idea that just didn’t pan out. I’ll probably leave the branch around, though. It might be useful eventually anyway. Maybe I could use it to use a new perl to “cross-compile” for deployment on an older environment, like at work.
Most of my time, as seems traditional at this point, was spent on PAUSE. I went into the hackathon with one big goal: I wanted to get PAUSE running on Plack. Until now, PAUSE has been running on mod_perl. All other potential objections to mod_perl aside, there’s a problem: it means that testing the PAUSE website requires a running mod_perl (and, thus, Apache) instance. What a pain!
I’d really wanted to work on this, and every once in a while I would have a look at the code and think about how I’d do it, but never very hard. When I finally sat down to do the work, I started to think that it was going to be a nightmare. I didn’t think I could get it done in time. I despaired. I said, “I think we should look at just starting over, but I know that’s usually a terrible idea.” There was some agreement that I might be right from other attendees.
Then, this happened:
So, @charsbar says "Are you still plackifying PAUSE?" "No, I gave it up as not doable in three days," I say. Five hours later, he has it! 😄— Ricardo Signes (@rjbs) April 17, 2015
Amazing! Now, “he has it” may have been a mild overstatement, but not really. He showed me the site working right there on the second day. Charsbar just needed to keep hacking at the details. By the end of the fourth day, it was live! You can log in and upload to pause2!
Speaking of logging in, that’s where I made my first actual bit of progress.
PAUSE passwords have long been crypted with
crypt, meaning the long-obsolete
DES algorithm. I’d been meaning for quite a while to switch it over to
bcrypt. The commits to switch PAUSE to
took a few goes, but it got done. To get your password rehashed, you just need
to log in. If you’ve uploaded since the weekend, you’ve already been rehashed!
Andreas König and I looked into the strange way that perl-5.18.4 still showed up in the CPAN index for things that perl-5.20.2 should’ve owned. This led to two small changes: we fixed bizarre error messages that appeared when you couldn’t get your Foo module indexed because of somebody else’s Bar.pm file; we allowed versions with underscores to be indexed if (and only if) the module was only available through perl, and was found in the latest perl release. This shouldn’t really happen, but when it does, better to index than to not!
I did a lot of work, through all this, on improving the TestPAUSE library that’s used to test the indexer. It makes it almost trivial to test the indexer. You can write code like this:
It starts a brand new PAUSE, uploads a file, indexes all the recent uploads, and gives you a “result” object that can do things like tell you what mail was sent, what’s in the various index files, what’s in the database, what got written to the logs, and what’s in the PAUSE-data git repository.
It was really worth working on, in part because it let me write the (still
tool. This tool takes a list of cpanid/dist pairs and uploads them to a new
fake CPAN, indexing them as often as you specify. It’s great for seeing what
the indexer would do on a dist you haven’t uploaded, or after a potential
bugfix. I’ve been looking at using it to do a historical replay of subsets of
the CPAN. It’s clearly going to be useful for testing improvements to the
indexer over time.
I’ve still got a few tasks left over that I’d like to get to, including warnings to users who don’t have license or metafile data. I’d also like to implement the “fast deletion” feature to let you delete files from your CPAN directory sooner than three days from now — and charsbar’s Plackification work should make that so much easier!
A few years after I published Dist::Zilla, I wanted to see how many indexed distributions had been built by it. I wrote a really crummy script using David Golden’s excellent CPAN::Visitor to crawl through all of the CPAN and report on what seemed to have been used to build the dist. Every once in a while, I’d re-run the script to get newer data, occasionally making a small improvement to the code.
The big problem, though, was its speed. It took hours to run. This was, in part, because it ran in strict series. I’d tried to parallelize it one night, but it was a half-hearted attempt, and it didn’t quite work. At the QAH, though, a task came up for which it was going to be well-suited. The gang voted to begin requiring a META file of some sort for indexing, and I wanted to see how many dists already had one, and of what kind. My script would provide this! I got it running in parallel, taking it down to about 90 minutes of runtime. David Golden remarked that he’d just been writing something similar, and had it running in about 75 minutes.
It was on!
We both worked on our code off and on while solving other problems, trading bug reports and optimizations. Maybe it wasn’t very cutthroat, but I felt motivated to improve the code more and more. Last I checked, we both had our indexers gathering tons more information and running (across the whole of the CPAN index) in fifteen minutes.
I’m pretty sure we can both get it faster, yet, too.
I have my CPAN-Metanalyzer, in very rough form, up on GitHub. I’ll probably keep working on it, though, and use it instead of CPANDB in the ancient code I once had using that.
Early on, Miyagawa asked whether we could provide structured data from
CPAN::Meta::Requirements objects. These are the things that tell you what
versions of what modules your code needs to be tested, built, run, and so on.
You could only get the string form out, leading to re-parsing stuff like
< 5, != 4.4, which is a big drag. I suggested an API and that maybe I
could do it the next day. The next day…
The API was even exactly what I’d suggested. Woah!
I also found some really weird-o problems. I had my meta-analyzer looking
for valid or invalid
META.json files, and I found an extremely high number of
bogus ones. Why? Well, there were two common cases:
What?! I still have no idea where this came from, and I couldn’t produce this behavior by re-testing old releases of JSON::PP. There was no report of behavior like this in changelogs. I don’t know!
Part of the problem is that you can’t tell from a dist just which JSON emitter
was used to make its
META.json. I’ve got a trial release of
that adds an
x_serialization_backend to store this data. Too bad I didn’t
think of this nine months ago! (Most or many of these errors, if not all, were
in September 2014.) Hopefully that will go into production in about a week.
The Trip Home
After the end of the QAH, we got dinner and went back to the hotel. We tried to go to the conference space (betahaus in Berlin) but it was locked up with some of our hackers still inside. This had actually happened to me one night: without somebody with keys around, you could get stuck inside. I’m told that some people had to jump the fence. I was luckier than that.
At the hotel we sat around, talked about what we’d gotten done, and I did just a little more coding on my CPAN crawler. Eventually, though, I got to bed so that I could get up bright and early for the flight home. We left the hotel around seven.
I didn’t really try to sleep on the plane. Instead, I poked at code that I could think about with my sleep-deprived brain. I ran an ngircd IRC daemon on my laptop and chatted with some fellow travelers. I watched the entire Back to the Future trilogy. It was a decent flight. (Except for lunch. Lunch was really lousy.) Only yesterday, I found out that there’s been a sudden crackdown on people doing suspicious computer things on the plane. “Look out for plane hackers!” I can only imagine what would’ve happened if we had, as I considered doing, set up Mumble to voice chat during the flight.
Now that I’m home, I’ve got plenty of other stuff to catch up on, but I’m trying to keep my momentum going. I’ve got plenty of my usual post-QAH energy, and a fair number of remaining things to do, and I think I can actually do them.
We don’t yet know where QAH 2016 will be, but I hope to make it there!