email addressing sucks
I know that most people know how much email addresses suck, but I found this message in Mutt while looking for something else, and I thought it was a nice illustration.
A user of Email::Valid writes:
I was doing some testing with Email::Valid, and I came across this:
$ perl -MEmail::Valid -e \ "print Email::Valid->address('dave@#%^&*$.com') \ ? 'yes' : 'no'" yes $
This prints “yes”, and I don’t understand why that address would be seen as valid. It doesn’t seem to matter what characters are in the domain part of the address, it always gets marked as valid.
Let’s have a look!
You don’t think this should be valid. Let’s consult the RFC.
Section 6.1 says that an address must be
. That is:
local-part "@" domain
I’m guessing you don’t dispute that “dave” is a valid local-part. A
must be: sub-domain *("." sub-domain) I'm also guessing you don't dispite that "com" is a valid sub- domain. So, is "#%^&*$"? Well, let's see... sub-domain = domain-ref / domain-literal domain-literal = "[" *(dtext / quoted-pair) "]" domain-ref = atom There are no square brackets, so there is no domain-literal involved. That means that if "#%^&*$" is a valid atom, it is also a valid domain-ref, and the address matches the addr-spec pattern. The atom pattern is: atom = 1*<any CHAR except specials, SPACE and CTLs> None of those characters are space or control characters. The specials are: specials = "(" / ")" / "<" / ">" / "@" ; Must be in quoted- / "," / ";" / ":" / "\" / <"> ; string, to use / "." / "[" / "]" None of them are specials, either! Are you shocked? Don't be! RFC822 sucks! I hope this helped. Good night! :)